All CANS 5+ assessments included in this plan were completed between 2016-05-23 and 2025-12-31, using data entered as of 2025-12-31.

Recommendations for Wraparound with Intensive Services

At intake, a client is recommended for Wraparound with Intensive Services (WISe) if Criterion 1, and either Criterion 2 or Criterion 3 are met:

Criterion 1. Behavioral/Emotional Needs

  • Rating of 3 on “Psychosis” OR
  • Rating of 2 on “Psychosis” and 2 or 3 on any other Behavioral/Emotional Needs item OR
  • 2 or more ratings of 3 on any Behavioral/Emotional Needs items OR
  • 3 or more ratings of 2 or 3 on any Behavioral/Emotional Needs items

Note: Behavioral/emotional needs items we plan to include in our screener: Psychosis; Attention/Impulse; Mood Disturbance; Anxiety; Disruptive Behavior; Adjustment to Trauma; Emotional Control

Criterion 2. Risk Factors

  • Rating of 3 on “Danger to Others” or “Suicide Risk” OR
  • One rating of 3 on any Risk Factor item OR 2+ ratings of 2 or 3 on any Risk Factor item

Note: Risk factors included: Suicide Risk; Non-Suicidal Self-Injury; Danger to Others; or Runaway.

Criterion 3. Serious Functional Impairment

  • 2 or more ratings of 3 on “Family”, “School”, “Interpersonal” or “Living Situation” OR
  • 3 ratings of 2 on “Family”, “School”, “Interpersonal” and “Living Situation”

WISe Recommendation Rates

The plot shows the number and percentage of all clients that were recommended for WISe services, out of all those who were screened in that year. Each point on the graph indicates the percent or count of persons in a given quarter who are recommended for WISe services, based upon the algorithm above. Please note that “Counts by Quarter” are affected by the date in the current quarter when the report is run. Reports run before a quarter is complete will routinely undercount the Recommendation Count.

Percentages By Quarter

Percentages By Quarter, Comparing Years

Counts By Quarter

Recommendation Against WISe Algorithm Rates

The following plot represents the number and percentage of all clients that the algorithm recommended into WISe, but whose referral clinician recommended a program other than WISe–against the algorithm–out of all those who were screened in that year. Each point on the graph indicates the percent or count of persons in a given quarter whose referral clinician recommended against the algorithm.

Percentage By Quarter

Percentage By Quarter, Comparing Years

Counts By Quarter

Screener Timeliness

The following graphs report by cohort year and quarter on the percent of clients who received an on-time screener (within 10 business days of referral). Each point on the graph indicates the percent of persons in a given quarter who received an on-time screener.

Note that there may be fewer cohort years represented than exist in the date, as this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served in these cohorts, those reports are suppressed.

By Quarter

By Quarter, Contrasting Year

Full Assessment Timeliness

The following graphs report by cohort year and quarter on the percent of clients who received an on-time assessment (within 30 days of the last initial screener). Each point on the graph indicates the percent of persons in a given quarter who received an on-time full assessment at entry.

Note that there may be fewer cohort years represented than exist in the date, as this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served in these cohorts, those reports are suppressed.

By Quarter

Full Assessment Timeliness by Enrollment Date

The following graphs report by cohort year and quarter on the percent of clients who received an on-time assessment (within 30 days of the recorded enrollment date).

Only clients with an available, valid enrollment date are included in the calculations displayed.

Each point on the graph indicates the percent of persons in a given quarter who received an on-time full assessment at entry.

Note that there may be fewer cohort years represented than exist in the date, as this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served in these cohorts, those reports are suppressed.

Note in BHAS Enrollment Date information is not consistently available for youth who entered care prior to Quarter 3 of 2019. Data prior to this time period will be suppressed from this section of the QMP reports.

By Quarter

Continuing in WISe

The following graphs report by cohort year and quarter on the percent and number of clients who continued in care (i.e. received both a screener and a full assessment). Each point on the graph indicates the percent of persons in a given quarter who ‘continued in care’ based upon this logic.

Note that there may be fewer cohort years represented than exist in the data, as this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served in these cohorts, those reports are suppressed.

Please note that the ‘Percent Continuing in Care’ by Quarter, and by Quarter, Contrasting Year graphs require 30 days beyond the end of a quarter to generate accurate estimates. So the results for this graph do not include the children and youth screened in to WISe during the most recent quarter (there is a one-quarter lag in these results).

By Quarter

By Quarter, Contrasting Year

Cross System Involvement at Entry

The following charts detail the percent of screener assessments that belong to clients who entered services in the given year. The last initial screener from each client episode was used to determine the client’s cross-system involvements for said episode. The sum of percentages may exceed 100 percent, as clients may be involved with multiple systems at entry into services.

Note that there may be fewer cohort years represented than exist in the data, as this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served in these cohorts, those reports are suppressed.

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Referral Source at Entry

The following charts details for each cohort year the percent and number of screener assessments that belong to clients who were referred from the indicated cross-system sources. The last initial screener from each client episode was used, to indicate one referral source per episode.

Note that there may be fewer cohort years represented than exist in the data, as this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served in these cohorts, those reports are suppressed.

Note that clients who did not have referral source information recorded in their most recent screener are excluded from these calculations.

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Treatment Needs at Entry

The graphs below report point-in-time (at Initial assessment) and comparison-across-time (between Initial and reassessment) percentages of clients experiencing particular actionable needs (items rated as a ‘2’ or ‘3’) on the CANS 5+.

These calculations are based off of the Treatment needs at entry are identified among items in the “Behavioral/Emotional Needs”, “Life Functioning”, and “Risk Behavior” domains. The figure below identifies the top six actionable needs at initial intake in the Behavioral and Emotional Needs and Risk Factors Domain AND the top four actionable needs at initial intake in the Life Domain Functioning. If there is a tie between two top six/top four treatment needs in these domains, both items are included in the figure, which sometimes causes than ten items to be displayed. If applicable, the figure shows what percentage of clients continue to have actionable needs on these same items as of a later reassessment.

Note that there may be fewer assessment periods represented in this series of graphs than just above. This is a consequence of the fact that this report does not display any information calculated off of groups of clients smaller than 10. While there are clients being served at these later periods, those reports are suppressed.

Across All Clients

2017 Cohort

Initial

3mo

6mo

9mo

12mo

15mo

18mo

21mo

24mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

27mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

30mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

2018 Cohort

Initial

3mo

6mo

9mo

12mo

15mo

18mo

21mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

24mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

27mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

30mo

A graph cannot be generated, because in the given cohort year and sample, fewer than 10 clients were assessed.

2019 Cohort

Initial

3mo

6mo

9mo

12mo